Skip to main content

Dynamics AX 2012 Excel Add-in document services and queries with missing relatios

While working on an assignment where I among other things had to prepare a new query for use with document services and the Excel add-in.

The query consisted of three nested data sources, where two was standard tables and the third was a new table which I had added to the system.

First version worked just fine. I exposed the query through document services and I could get data in Excel.

The for some reason I decided to change the relations on the table I had added, for reasons that I forget.

However suddenly my query was not showing up in the pick list, when I using the "Dynamics AX" / Add Data button i Excel.

The reason ? I had messed up the relation from my new table to the standard table, making the relation empty.

The Excel add-in reacts by simply not showing the now invalid query in the list, but it does not warn you that something is wrong.

I got a clue to this, by trying to use "Add table" instead going directly for my new table.
Then Excel add-in showed me an error message, where it stated that something was wrong in the relation.

I proceeded to correct the table relation, and voila, my query was back in action to serve as a Document data source.

So if you experience that your query will not show up in the Excel add-in try checking that the table relations of the tables used in the query, or the relations used in the query are valid.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Indicating mandatory field in a dialog (RunBase) class.

A classical problem is indicating that a field is mandatory in a dialog, when the field is not bound to a datasource/field in a datasource. Normally fellow developers will tell you that, that is not possible. I found a way to do this. In your Runbase-based class you can implement the putToDialog-method e.g like this: protected void putToDialog() { super(); fieldMask.fieldControl().mandatory(true); } where fieldMask is a DialogField object in your dialog. This will make the field act like it was a mandatory field from a datasource in a form, showing a red-wavy line under the field, and requiring the field to have a value. Attention: Your class has to run on the client.If you set your class to run on the server, you get a run-time error, when the fieldMask.FieldControl()-call is made.

Suppressing the infolog

Supressing the infolog is often useful in D365FO when augmenting code. When augmenting code using COC (Chain Of Command), you can have new code run either before or after the code you are augmenting. This means that any infolog-messages that the standard application code does, will be shown to the user, even if your augmentation supports a scenario where there must be no infolog-messages. How do you avoid the standard application infolog-messages ? To the rescue comes temporary supression of the infolog. The suppression consists of: 1) Saving the current infologLevel 2) Setting the infologLevel to SysInfologLevel::None 3) Run your code 4) Restoring the saved infologLevel to the infolog For example a table could have a validatewrite-method that validates that you are only allowed to use 3 out of 6 options in an enum-field, and you need to allow for a fourth one. Table a - validateWrite method: boolean validateWrite() {     Switch (this.enumField)     {     ...

ProcessGuide framework

I was tasked with developing a custom "process" for printing ad hoc labels in the Dynamics 365SCM WHS app. WHS process guide - development docs Reading the great articles from 1clickfactory (starting point  https://www.1clickfactory.com/blog/advanced-whs-mobile-device-development-part-1-process-guide-framework/) gives a good starting point. Especially Edgaras' tip on running  SysExtensionCache::clearAllScopes();  in a runnable class after introducing a new step/pagebuilder class combination  is VERY useful. And of course Microsoft's own documentation ( https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/supply-chain/warehousing/process-guide-framework ) also helps. However, I wanted to chip in with a couple of things. Extending WHS base enums If you extend the WHSActivity, WHSWorkExecuteMode or WHSWorktransType base enums with new options it is a good idea to run a database synchronization when you are done with extending them. Otherwise you might be frustrated to find, th...